The final toll of the violent eruption in Gaza, as reported by the media, was 167 Palestinians killed, an indeterminate number injured, versus 6 Israelis killed and an undisclosed number injured. On the Palestinian side, observers estimate that at least half of the fatalities were those of women and children. The destruction of Gaza City’s infrastructure was also on a massive scale, which would take the beleaguered Hamas government many years to repair and renovate. While President Morsi of Egypt strengthened through the presence of Hilary Clinton – who conducted shuttle diplomacy, reminiscent of Kissinger, between Cairo, Jerusalem and Ramallah – were both rightly praised for their successful mediation. The cease-fire has held so far.
Meanwhile, Morsi has become embroiled with his judiciary after assuming sweeping powers, which he says he will relinquish when a new constitution is in place. His move, however, has ignited a storm of protest from the senior judges as well as elements of the populace. Morsi appears to be on the back foot and therefore does not have the time to follow through on the cease-fire by pushing along the implementation of the elements agreed to between Israel and Hamas. These include a stoppage of weapons into Gaza through the border with Egypt. In return, Israel would loosen the virtual siege of Gaza it has perpetrated on the 1.5 million Gaza Palestinians who occupy the world’s most densely populated strip of territory. The United Nations commenting on the worsening economic, social and human conditions of the Gazans has predicted that the territory would become uninhabitable by the year 2020. This is a sobering warning.
It is therefore imperative that Egypt, the United States, Turkey and Qatar should remain actively involved in pushing both sides to honor their commitments vis-a-vis each other. The process could be visibly improved if both Israel and the United States would bring themselves to talk directly to Hamas, instead of refusing to do so on the grounds that it is a ‘terrorist organization’. It is worth recalling that a few years back Hamas had offered a hudna (long-term truce) to Israel, but the proposal was not followed through. Since the device of the hudna has great religious significance for Muslims, such a truce would not be easily broken, even by an organization considered to be militant extremists. The mutual distrust between Israel and Hamas could have been mitigated by the acceptance of the Hamas proposal. Direct talks between adversaries are usually always more productive than going through intermediaries. Also, both countries could do well to heed the advice of Mother Teresa, who said that one does not need to talk to one’s friends, but one needs to talk to one’s enemies.
-
Gaza Erupts in Violence
It is the same blood soaked violence in Gaza once again.Israel and Hamas are squaring off in an unequal...
-
The United States’ Stance on Sino-Japanese Maritime Dispute
Below is my blog that was published in the Huffington Post on February 14, 2014: The United States’ stance...
-
The Rohingyas: another baleful example of ethnic cleansing
The international media is paying considerable attention to the stories of bedraggled men, women and children fleeing their homes...
-
U.S. Ambassadorial Appointments
From the emergence of the United States as an independent country, the spoils system has been prominent in how...
-
Municipal Elections in Turkey-Victory for Erdogan’s Party
Below is my blog which appeared in the Huffington Post on 3/31/2014: Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, head...
-
Locking horns on the Korean Peninsula
The United States and North Korea have a long and bitter history of antagonism which was largely a reflection...
-
Chinese Prime Minister visits India- 5-22-2013
The recently installed Chinese Prime Minister Li Keqiang paid a three day visit to India which concluded today. It...
-
The Politics of Judicial Repression in Egypt
This is from my blog carried by the Huffington Post on 4/30/2014 According to a recent op-ed in the...